শনিবার, ১৫ সেপ্টেম্বর, ২০১২

Presidential election brings out surprises on Facebook

He's the younger brother of a girl I knew in elementary school in Cleveland. Until he friended me on Facebook a few years ago, we hadn't been in touch since Lyndon Johnson was battling Barry Goldwater for the presidency.

So why was I surprised ? and annoyed ? when his recent status messages in my Facebook news feed featured a thumbs-up for "Things Liberals Hate," a snarky "NObama" meme, and a shout-out to the host of a fundraiser for Mitt Romney?

Because Facebook has become a political battleground ? with the civic pretension of a campaign town hall and the clumsy incivility of a brewing street brawl.

We might not talk politics in the office, at the gym, in the beauty shop ... but we've got no qualms about spreading recycled "birther" drivel or savagely mocking Romney's gaffes with strangers, ad nauseam, online.

We're exposed to the political views of "friends" in a way we've never been before. That's made this presidential campaign, for many people, a jarring wake-up call.

Like the woman I met last week, as we sat at the bar in an Encino restaurant watching Barack Obama deliver his convention speech. She's a center-leaning Democrat, with a far-flung group of longtime friends who share her husband's passion for racing cars ? but not, apparently, her politics.

"You spend all this time with these very, very intelligent people, who are very nice, good people at heart," she said. Then you read their emails and Facebook posts "and it makes you wonder what you missed.

"Can they really be that dumb?"

::

The last time we elected a president, Facebook was 4 years old. In that campaign, the social network was mostly a messaging venue for savvy political strategists and grass-roots activists, trying to rally the faithful.

But it came of age as a political force in the midterm elections two years ago, when an "I Voted" message shared on election day among millions of Facebook friends prompted hundreds of thousands of people who might not have voted to cast their ballots.

That was the conclusion of a study published this week by UC San Diego professor James Fowler, who has spent years researching the impact of those political posts that are clogging up our Facebook feeds.

This year, half of all Americans over age 12 are sporting Facebook profiles, and the social network has become our desperate and divided electorate's megaphone.

I miss what I used to consider mundane: the vacation photos of people I barely know, heartwarming animal videos, chronicles of friends' weight loss campaigns.

They've been swallowed up by posts about Obama's birth certificate and Romney's tax returns, tributes to the First Couple's romance, memes of Clint Eastwood and the empty chair.

The deluge has even sparked its own Facebook squabble, over whether it's an impolite intrusion or a civic responsibility to push political views online.

Fowler's not surprised that even innocuous political posts wind up provoking such turmoil.

That's because they violate traditional social norms that frown on public arguments about religion or politics. And they challenge the notion that friendship is vested in compatibility, by revealing unexpected views of people we thought we knew.

In person, people tend to steer clear of sensitive subjects, Fowler said, "because they don't want to take the risk of hurting someone or damaging relationships with people they like and respect."

But your online social network is broad, amorphous and tangentially connected. These are people you know from the gym, your children's school, your fantasy football league.

Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-banks-facebook-20120915,0,2722618.column?track=rss

academy awards 2012 albert nobbs a star is born oscar nominees oscar nominations 2012 kombucha tea separation of church and state

কোন মন্তব্য নেই:

একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন